Zika virus

Discussion in 'The Compound' started by Giada, Jan 17, 2016.

  1. Giada MAGA

    Member Since:
    Aug 18, 2014
    Message Count:
    4,646
    Reputation:
    102,678,486
    Ratings Received:
    +5,068 / 107 / -27
    Hawaii reports first US case of Zika-linked brain damage


    The Zika virus, which is transmitted by mosquitos, cannot spread between humans. It often produces flu-like symptoms (fever, headaches and joint pain) as well as skin rashes and conjunctivitis.
    Those symptoms appear within three to 12 days of the mosquito bite. In 80 percent of cases, the infection goes unnoticed, and it is very rarely fatal.

    In Brazil, more than 3,500 cases of microcephaly were recorded between October and January, just as the Zika epidemic was spreading.
    Tests indicated that in at least four cases, the fetus developed the malformation during pregnancy because of the virus, the CDC said.
    It said that 26 cases of Zika infection have been diagnosed in the United States since 2007 among people who contracted the disease outside the country.

    http://news.yahoo.com/hawaii-reports-first-us-case-zika-linked-brain-213633136.html

    Geographic Distribution

    http://www.cdc.gov/zika/geo/index.html
    http://www.cdc.gov/zika/symptoms/index.html


    Where has Zika virus been found?

    • Prior to 2015, Zika virus outbreaks had been identified in countries in Africa, Southeast Asia, and the Pacific Islands.
    • In May 2015, the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) issued an alert regarding the first confirmed Zika virus infections in Brazil. Currently, outbreaks are occurring in many countries in the Americas. In December 2015, Puerto Rico reported its first confirmed Zika virus case.
    • Locally-transmitted Zika virus has not been reported elsewhere in the United States, but cases of Zika have been reported in returning travelers. With the recent outbreaks in the Pacific Islands and South America, the number of Zika cases among travelers visiting or returning to the United States will likely increase. These imported cases may result in local spread of the virus in some areas of the United States.
    [IMG]
    Latest Given Reputation Points:
    Angroid: 43,385 Points Jan 22, 2016
    Burt: 13,964 Points Jan 27, 2016
    • Informative Informative x 2
    • List
  2. Mandalore in recovery from sobriety

    Member Since:
    Apr 20, 2010
    Message Count:
    2,906
    Reputation:
    71,364,866
    Ratings Received:
    +4,866 / 35 / -83
    More proof that God hates niggers and spics.

    No, seriously. The rest of you guys ever consider the possibility that we've been thwarting God's plan to restore balance on earth by wiping out undesirables? Is it really a coincidence that we would never have to worry about any of this shit if we completely avoided contact with other groups of hominids?
    Latest Given Reputation Points:
    Bluto: 79,300 Points Jan 17, 2016
    Giada: 43,602 Points Jan 17, 2016
    Johnson: 91,783 Points Feb 29, 2016
    • Post of the Day Post of the Day x 2
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
    • List
  3. Bluto Drunken lout

    Member Since:
    Apr 22, 2010
    Message Count:
    12,258
    Reputation:
    193,628,919
    Ratings Received:
    +15,988 / 64 / -166
    Yes, da joys o' da spread o' divershitty. Moar diseases, crime & filth.

    Who don't hate niggers & spics? Fuckin' niggers & correspondingly greasers is deir own worst emenies. & dem pretend self-proclaimin' White lovers o' divershitty is lyin' t'rough deir teef or is fuckin' insane. & da jews despise everyone 'ceptin' demselves.
    Latest Given Reputation Points:
    Giada: 43,602 Points Jan 17, 2016
  4. Giada MAGA

    Member Since:
    Aug 18, 2014
    Message Count:
    4,646
    Reputation:
    102,678,486
    Ratings Received:
    +5,068 / 107 / -27
    • Informative Informative x 1
    • List
  5. Angroid CyberSperg 1138

    Member Since:
    Sep 4, 2012
    Message Count:
    5,414
    Location:
    EUSSR
    Reputation:
    76,711,945
    Ratings Received:
    +7,695 / 28 / -45
    CIA & CDC (Center for Disease Control) are testing the Final Solution.
    Latest Given Reputation Points:
    Giada: 43,853 Points (Possible.) Jan 22, 2016
  6. Giada MAGA

    Member Since:
    Aug 18, 2014
    Message Count:
    4,646
    Reputation:
    102,678,486
    Ratings Received:
    +5,068 / 107 / -27
    Time to move to Chile or Canada. :lol:
    10-12 yrs to find a vaccine?
    F-ing mosquitoes.
    If they know it's in the same family as yellow fever/Japanese encephalitis why not inoculate with those?
    Although, those vaccines only have a 10 year life span.
    Zika virus: US scientists say vaccine '10 years away'

    http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-35423288
  7. Burt .

    Member Since:
    May 3, 2015
    Message Count:
    1,367
    Reputation:
    35,513,750
    Ratings Received:
    +2,144 / 27 / -27
    To me it would sound like a good idea to screen people coming into the USA, but I don't think they will and this could make it to Canada as well, thanks Barry, (and friends)

  8. Giada MAGA

    Member Since:
    Aug 18, 2014
    Message Count:
    4,646
    Reputation:
    102,678,486
    Ratings Received:
    +5,068 / 107 / -27

    They didn't screen people with HIV/AIDS, SARS, Ebola, etc, etc....they've known about Zika since 2007 (actually 1947).

    It really only affects pregnant women and probably people with weak immune systems.
    Latest Given Reputation Points:
    Johnson: 84,088 Points (probably not.) Jan 28, 2016
    • Informative Informative x 1
    • List
  9. Johnson demented lumberjack

    Member Since:
    Apr 20, 2010
    Message Count:
    10,492
    Location:
    shit abyss
    Reputation:
    195,562,195
    Ratings Received:
    +14,332 / 200 / -310
    ZiKR ViRUS

    Latest Given Reputation Points:
    Giada: 44,452 Points (would you stop that.) Jan 28, 2016
    Bluto: 83,035 Points Feb 3, 2016
    • Post of the Day Post of the Day x 1
    • List
  10. Giada MAGA

    Member Since:
    Aug 18, 2014
    Message Count:
    4,646
    Reputation:
    102,678,486
    Ratings Received:
    +5,068 / 107 / -27
  11. Giada MAGA

    Member Since:
    Aug 18, 2014
    Message Count:
    4,646
    Reputation:
    102,678,486
    Ratings Received:
    +5,068 / 107 / -27
    [IMG]
    Latest Given Reputation Points:
    Johnson: 84,233 Points Jan 29, 2016
  12. Angroid CyberSperg 1138

    Member Since:
    Sep 4, 2012
    Message Count:
    5,414
    Location:
    EUSSR
    Reputation:
    76,711,945
    Ratings Received:
    +7,695 / 28 / -45
    Latest rumours are claiming that this outbreak may have been caused by some genetic lab meddling, after they released a batch of engineered mosquitos (supposedly) meant to combat the spread of dengue fever.

    In Groid's opinion most o' these outbreaks we've been having over the years (swine flu, bird flu, ebola, new types of flu like the one currently going around in Ukraine, zika etc) have either been deliberately engineered and released or released due to incompetent or greedy meddling by biotech Frankensteiner :jew:
    Latest Given Reputation Points:
    Giada: 45,516 Points Jan 30, 2016
    313Chris: 33,288 Points Jan 30, 2016
    • Informative Informative x 1
    • List
  13. Giada MAGA

    Member Since:
    Aug 18, 2014
    Message Count:
    4,646
    Reputation:
    102,678,486
    Ratings Received:
    +5,068 / 107 / -27
    Pregnant woman among 3 confirmed Zika cases in New York City New York City health officials say three New Yorkers have contracted the Zika virus.

    All three had recently returned from countries that have experienced a Zika outbreak.
    The virus is believed to spread to people through the bites of infected mosquitoes.
    "Yesterday we were informed of a laboratory confirmed case of Zika in a pregnant woman who traveled to an area with an ongoing Zika transmission," said Health Commissioner Bassett. "There is no risk of acquiring the Zika virus in New York City. The mosquito responsible for transmission in areas of Latin America and the Caribbean is aedis aegypti which is a mosquito species that we do not see here."
    http://www.aol.com/article/2016/01/...ases-in-new-york-city/21304734/?intcmp=hplnws
    Latest Given Reputation Points:
    Angroid: 43,796 Points (ouch) Jan 31, 2016
    • Informative Informative x 1
    • List
  14. Giada MAGA

    Member Since:
    Aug 18, 2014
    Message Count:
    4,646
    Reputation:
    102,678,486
    Ratings Received:
    +5,068 / 107 / -27
    Zika Virus May Push South America to Loosen Abortion Bans
    But most of these Latin American countries are also Catholic, so access to birth control is often poor and abortion is flat-out banned. “This kind of recommendation that women should avoid pregnancy is not realistic,” says Beatriz Galli, a Brazil-based policy advisor for the reproductive health organization Ipas. “How can they put all the burden of this situation on the women?”
    In Brazil, where Zika has hit the hardest, birth control is available—though poor and rural women can still get left out. One report estimates that unplanned pregnancies make up over half of all births in the country. And abortion is illegal, except in cases of rape and certain medical conditions. A raft of impending legislation in Brazil’s conservative-held congress may make it harder to get abortions even in those exempted cases.

    http://www.wired.com/2016/01/abortion-and-zika-south-america/


    Pope Francis asks Catholic priests to pardon women who have undergone abortion

    http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-09-...ts-to-pardon-women-who-have-abortions/6742154 @Johnson
    Latest Given Reputation Points:
    Angroid: 43,901 Points (They'd be better off banning US bio-weapons labs from operating on this territory.) Feb 1, 2016
    Fatale: 9,638 Points Apr 17, 2016
    • Informative Informative x 2
    • List
  15. Angroid CyberSperg 1138

    Member Since:
    Sep 4, 2012
    Message Count:
    5,414
    Location:
    EUSSR
    Reputation:
    76,711,945
    Ratings Received:
    +7,695 / 28 / -45
    Loosen abortion bans in response? Gee.... that's a solution.

    Many if not most of these offshored US "Disease Control" labs operating in Africa, South America and Eastern European shitholes are fronts for bio-weapons research. They're engineering viruses and plagues which would be difficult to do within the US itself, due to legal restrictions. Solution? They offshore it.

    Likewise, a lot of Frankenstein science and genetic human experiments are being conducted in offshore labs for the same reasons.
    Latest Given Reputation Points:
    Giada: 45,772 Points Feb 1, 2016
  16. Giada MAGA

    Member Since:
    Aug 18, 2014
    Message Count:
    4,646
    Reputation:
    102,678,486
    Ratings Received:
    +5,068 / 107 / -27
    • Informative Informative x 1
    • List
  17. Bluto Drunken lout

    Member Since:
    Apr 22, 2010
    Message Count:
    12,258
    Reputation:
    193,628,919
    Ratings Received:
    +15,988 / 64 / -166
    :agree:
    Latest Given Reputation Points:
    Angroid: 44,018 Points (Fucking crystal rock worshippers) Feb 3, 2016
  18. Giada MAGA

    Member Since:
    Aug 18, 2014
    Message Count:
    4,646
    Reputation:
    102,678,486
    Ratings Received:
    +5,068 / 107 / -27
  19. Roy Fokker Forum Veteran

    Member Since:
    Jul 29, 2012
    Message Count:
    7,869
    Reputation:
    -12,086,908
    Ratings Received:
    +9,916 / 169 / -257
    'Is the dreaded Zika virus another giant scam?'

    by Jon Rappoport

    January 28, 2016

    (To read about Jon’s mega-collection, Power Outside The Matrix, click here.)

    Hysteria sells and…

    It’s hysteria time again. Let me run it down for you.

    This is the word: The dreaded Zika virus! Watch out! It’s carried by mosquitos! It can cause birth defects—babies are born with very small heads and impaired brains!

    Here are a few scare headlines that were running on Drudge as of 1/26:

    “Brazil sends 200,000 soldiers to stop spread of Zika.”

    “Stay away from Rio if you’re pregnant.”

    “’Losing battle’ against mosquito.”

    “Virus threatening two continents.”

    Want more hysteria? The Daily Mail indicates pregnant women are being warned not to travel to 22 countries in Latin America and Africa. Several Zika cases are being reported in Italy, the UK, and Spain.

    Then we have this from the Washington Post (“As Zika virus spreads, El Salvador asks women not to get pregnant until 2018,” 1/22, with italics added):

    “The rapid spread of the Zika virus has prompted Latin American governments to urge women not to get pregnant for up to two years, an extraordinary precaution aimed at avoiding birth defects believed to be linked to the mosquito-borne illness.

    …a potentially culture-shaping phenomenon in which the populations of several nations have been asked to delay procreation. The World Health Organization says at least 20 countries or territories in the region, including Barbados and Bolivia, Guadeloupe and Guatemala, Puerto Rico and Panama, have registered transmission of the virus.”

    So we now have governments warning women not to get pregnant. A new form of depopulation. Don’t get pregnant. If you do, and a mosquito bites you, you could give birth to a severely damaged child. Not only that, we have massive advisories against travel, for pregnant women. And 200,000 soldiers in Brazil, the site of the upcoming Olympics, are going door to door and distributing information about this new “plague.” Are the soldiers also telling men and women not to have sex? Who knows?

    So let’s take a little side trip to Scam City and examine the science behind the Zika virus and the assertion that it is causing birth defects.
    Before a virus can be said to cause disease, a few procedures need to occur. First, the virus must be proved to exist. It has to be isolated from a human carrier as diseased tissue, and then that tissue has to be put under an electron microscope, where many, many (Zika) viruses can be seen. Second, tests have to be run on many suspected human cases, and these tests have to reveal very large amounts of Zika in the body. That’s your basic starter kit for deciding that a virus might be causing actual human disease.

    In examining the published literature on Zika, so far I see no reports of diseased-tissue removal from a human, followed by electron microscope photos revealing large amounts of Zika.

    As far as diagnostic tests on suspected human cases are concerned, I see, as usual, two major types of testing: antibody, and PCR. I’ll briefly review the egregious flaws in these tests.

    Antibodies are immune-system scouts which identify invaders in the body. The antibodies ID these villains so other elements of the immune system can repel and destroy them. When a test shows that antibodies geared to a specific virus/villain (like Zika) are present in the body, it means the body has contacted that Zika virus—if the test was done well and didn’t come up with a falsely-positive result. False positives are frequent. But more disastrously, proving the body had contact with a specific virus says absolutely nothing about whether the patient is sick or will get sick. In fact, before 1985, a positive antibody test was generally taken to be a good sign: the body’s immune system had encountered and overcome the invader. After 1985, the “science” was turned upside down: a positive test meant the person was sick or going to get sick. And that meant, of course, more (false) diagnoses of disease and more profit from treatments. In announced “epidemics,” health agencies can falsely inflate the numbers of cases to the moon.

    The PCR is a very sophisticated and tricky test to run. It is prone to errors. It takes a tiny, tiny amount of material assumed to be a fragment of a virus, and it amplifies (blows up) that fragment so it can be observed. The first problem with the test is: did technicians indeed choose a tiny sample that actually is a piece of the virus in question? Or is it simply a bit of genetic debris? The second problem is: the test, despite claims to the contrary, says nothing reliable about the amount of virus (like Zika) that is in the patient’s body. Why is this important? Because you need a great deal of virus in the body to begin to say it is causing disease. A very small amount is trivial.

    With these two useless tests in tow—the antibody and the PCR—researchers and doctors don’t have a meaningful clue about whether a patient is ill as a result of Zika infection. All case-number reports are suspect, to say the very least.

    Therefore, attributing very serious problems to Zika on a worldwide basis is insupportable and speculative. It isn’t science.

    And to make the leap to claiming the virus is causing pregnant women to give birth to babies with very small heads and impaired brains is absurd.
    Who benefits from this Zika “science”? Certainly, the people who are releasing genetically engineered (GE) mosquitos as a form of disease-prevention. The big honcho is a company named Oxitec. So far, the GE mosquitos are being used to curtail dengue fever in Brazil, Malaysia, and the Cayman Islands. Florida is next up on the agenda. But with Zika coming on strong in the press as a “mosquito-carried plague,” how long will it be before special bugs are modified to save the planet from this new threat…

    Just a few problems with the GE mosquitos, though.

    A town in Brazil has reported continuing elevated levels of dengue fever since the GE (genetically engineered) mosquitoes have been introduced to combat that disease.

    The scientific hypothesis is: the trickster GE bugs (males) will impregnate natural females, but no actual next generation will occur beyond the larval stage. However, this plummeting birth rate in mosquitoes is the only “proof” that the grand experiment is safe. No long-term health studies have been done—this is a mirror of what happened when GMO crops were introduced: no science, just bland assurances.

    Needless to say, without extensive lab testing, there is no way to tell what these GE mosquitoes are actually harboring, in addition to what researchers claim. That’s a major red flag.

    Wherever these GE mosquitoes have been introduced, or are about to be introduced, the human populations have not been consulted for their permission. It’s all being done by government and corporate edict. It’s human experimentation on a grand scale.

    There are concerns that, if indeed the dengue-carrying mosquitos are actually wiped out, the vacuum may be filled by another dengue carrier, the Asian Tiger Mosquito—which breeds much faster.

    Other than that, everything is perfect. Let’s have a big parade and welcome genetically-engineered mosquitos to planet Earth.
    Back to the Zika virus: what actually is causing mothers to give birth to babies with very small heads and impaired brains? If this is indeed a fairly recent phenomenon, I would start with a deep and very specific investigation of the genetically engineered mosquitos that were recently released in Brazil to decimate the dengue-fever mosquitos.

    Then I would pay attention to a report like this (Rio Times, 5/5/15, “Brazil Shown to Be Largest Global Consumer of Pesticides”):

    “The use of pesticides in Brazil grew by more than 162 percent from 2000 to 2012, according to the latest report by the Brazilian Association of Collective Health (ABRASCO), making the country the number one consumer of pesticides in the world. According to the entity, the Brazilian agriculture sector purchased more than 823,000 tons of pesticides in 2012.”

    “The ABRASCO report, titled ‘An Alert of the Impacts of Pesticides on Health’, was released last week in Rio de Janeiro. The report includes scientific studies including data from the National Cancer Institute that shows a direct link between the use of pesticides and health problems.”

    A quote inside the report:

    “Not only are we using more [pesticides] but we are using more powerful, stronger pesticides. We have been forced to import pesticides which were not even allowed in Brazil to combat pests which attacked GM soybean and cotton plants…”

    “…22 of the fifty main active ingredients used in pesticides in Brazil today have been banned in most other countries. “

    How about an in-depth investigation, on the ground, probing the connection between these pesticides and birth defects?

    Or is it better, for the chosen few, to use a virus as a false cover story, in order to explain away horrendous damage from what amounts to chemical warfare?

    ****Try this study, published in Environmental Health Perspectives on July 1, 2011: “Urinary Biomarkers of Prenatal Atrazine Exposure…” Here is a quote referring to what is now being called a prime Zika effect:

    “The presence versus absence of quantifiable levels of [the pesticide] atrazine or a specific atrazine metabolite was associated with fetal growth restriction… and small head circumference… Head circumference was also inversely associated with the presence of the herbicide metolachlor.”
    Getting the picture?

    Of course, both Atrazine and metolachlor pesticides are used in Brazil. Why is this connection to birth defects being overlooked? If this is still a serious question, in this day and age, and if the answers aren’t obvious, the questioner just arrived from Pluto.

    I have walked the path of making these connections since 1987. The covert op is played exactly like the old shell game. Look here, don’t look there. This is important, that means nothing.

    Tons and tons and tons of various pesticides and other poisonous chemicals…but forget that, it’s all because of a virus.

    “A virus” is the best false cover story ever invented.

    Jon Rappoport

    https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2016/01/28/is-the-dreaded-zika-virus-another-giant-scam/
  20. Giada MAGA

    Member Since:
    Aug 18, 2014
    Message Count:
    4,646
    Reputation:
    102,678,486
    Ratings Received:
    +5,068 / 107 / -27

Share This Page