Does this mean that they intend to stop importing ragheads en masse? Nope. http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/2219/netherlands-abandons-multiculturalism#.T7CFshnkQYi.facebook
By "integration," they mean "assimilation." Through genetic assimilation and intermarriage, they will destroy the unique phenotype of the Dutch peoples, of which recessive genes are a fundamental aspect. The Netherlands will be the next Portugal, but those on the far-right have made this prediction for a long time. For the cultural Marxists, everything is going according to plan. For the cultural rightists who are aware of cultural Marxist societal intentions, everything is going according to their projections. The Dutch people do not have the willpower, and particularly because of the overbearing presence of the EU, no longer possess the political capital to provide resistance to this project and to the genetic annihilation of their unique racial and/or ethnic (and by this I mean phenotypical) identity. Nothing short of armed insurrection and organized revolution can help them now. The new peoples who are set to be "integrated" (read: assimilated) are part and parcel of the political landscape and the major political parties will pander to them for votes as opposed to expelling them. The ones who want to resist this undesirable change need to look to the tactics of the fictional (quasi-historical as he existed) character William "the Butcher" Cutting from Gangs of New York.
The pendulum is just starting to swing back to segregation again.It was Jewish Dutch traders(traitors) who originally first went to Africa and bought black slaves.So it's very fitting that after over 500 years, they are just starting to wise up and notice the effect on their own precious piece of real estate.Just because they have a few rag heads up their asses now,doesn't mean they actually "yet" really understand how destructive and devastating literally millions of niggers,Spic's and Jews can actually be.I'd gladly send them a few hundred thousand of our spare niggers,just so they can get a really good taste of America's reality. Where's dem Dutch bitches
Not this old myth. Portugal is not a mulatto nation, retard. A very small number of Portuguese may have minute traces of black ancestry from the slave trade (just like White Americans), but that's the extent of it.
Young cinadeus, metroqueer emodouche chumLey things itself another asspieallonian and will get the same treatment or worse for it's yoooful nitwittery.
This seems to the same as when Merkel said multiculti has failed. What has Germany done since then? Enforced a slightly stricter policy on learning German. They say multiculti has failed, but they still retain their Cultural Marxist "Constitutional Nationalist" views.
So what you're saying is that if ass-imilated immigrants and native Dutch live together, they'll start mixing? Willingly? I don't know much about Portugal, but are you saying its population is heavily mixed?
The German people can show Merkel what they truly want by voting for anti-immigration parties. I refuse to believe that white people are so stupid that they don't see the connection between voting for pro-immigrant parties and more immigration. They don't even have get a majority of the votes. The Danish People's Party managed to make Danish politics more anti-immigration without being in majority. Hell, I'll probably vote for an anti-immigration party in the next election here. This is the problem of the assimilated turd worlder: If you live here long enough and you're assimilated in everything but biology and you feel like this is your country, you start looking down on immigrants who refuse to adapt or just think that "there are too many damn immigrants here these days", but at the same time, as a non-white immigrant, can you really oppose immigration?
Yes. It may take decades, or perhaps a hundred years, but history proves that this happens between individuals of equal legal & political status, regardless of phenotype. If the most proud, warlike, bloodthirsty and arguably quasi-sociopathic Romans succumbed to this fate, the generally liberal and arguably degenerate Dutch will easily fall to this fate! What happens to castes when they are no longer castes? I'm not a big fan of the old Santayana quote, but those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it in this particular case. The EU is in some ways like a new Rome, but the old patrician Romans are replaced with native European white peoples and the Indo-European Celtic & German settler foederati barbarians have been replaced with mud immigrants (to be assimilated - remember Caracalla?) and poonunakis (no offense). And as for the term "willingly," what constitutes what one does "willingly" when one's will is shaped by their environment and socialization? Human beings, by and large, are not free-spirited critically thinking individuals who question their programming. I could just say "yes," but I do not like leading questions with qualifiers like "heavily." But I will say that Portugal is more racially mixed than many European countries. Everything is relative, of course.
They didn't. The best of the Romans suffered heavy casualties during the *centuries* of warfare that defined the late Republican period, i.e. wars with Phoenicians, Anatolians, Persians, Berbers, Celts, Germanics, etc and civil wars, not to mention the innumerable aristocratic purges. Think how many aristocratic houses had to be wiped out simply for Octavian to rise to power as the first Emperor. Romans of the upper caste never recovered from these losses, despite maintaining their position at the top of the social order for another couple of centuries before being supplanted by aliens from the Levant. (And if we want to get technical about it, a third of the city of Rome's citizenry was of foreign origin by the time of Cicero, so in a sense the "multicult" trends in Rome began during the Republican period). The only reason that Levantines were able to establish such a foothold in later Imperial Rome was because of the toll that had been taken on the high caste Romans in the first place. Not only were they unable to recover from their losses, but their condition was further worsened by the degenerate practices of many of the Emperors. Romans (by race) maybe were technically socially engineered out of existence but that was only the acceleration of processes begun long before; by the time that "integration" was attempted in the days of Caracalla and afterwards, Rome had already become a proposition nation whose founding ethnic stock were a minority in the lands they had built. The fall of the Romans would have happened regardless.
I largely agree with you, but this presumes that "the best of the Romans" and the patrician class were the ones always bearing the brunt of these wars and wiping themselves out--they weren't, but then you even acknowledge that high caste Romans remained at the top of the social ladder for centuries thereafter. As for the Cicero comment; do you mean to say that a third of the city of Rome's population was of foreign origin by the time or Cicero, or that a third of them were citizens by the time of Cicero? I personally have not seen data related to that assertion, so I cannot say anything about the veracity of it regardless, but certainly a large proportion of the population were slaves and then even manumitted freedmen who assumed the name of their paterfamilias and who had assumed some of the rights of citizenship, but arguably not all of them (although, then again, "citizens" aren't even truly equal in rights despite the claims of egalitarianism in a modern multikult democracy, so perhaps they could be considered full citizens). I'm not doubting the veracity of your claim, I am sure that it is true, but if you do have a link concerning it I would be interested in giving it a look. We do know that Augustus recognized the perilous demographic position of the Romans within the Empire after some census taking, and you are right that the trends were in place long before Caracalla. I did not mean to suggest that Caracalla started the process of demographically annihilating true Romans through his legal acts, it was truly just an analogy to legal policies intended to fully disregard origin for the sake of assimilating everyone born within a border. But Caracalla certainly sounded the death knell to ensure that it was all over, just like the Dutch and other white countries are attempting now. It's the difference between jus soli citizenship and jus sanguinis citizenship. History reveals what happens to peoples who adopt the former when they have a permissive attitude toward permitting foreigners to settle in their territory: they are replaced, and often, their civilization or empire declines to a point where it is no longer recognized. And, even with those added premises, the comparison still remains valid. The Dutch are most likely doomed regardless of this policy, but it furthers them along the way toward destruction in my eyes. Constant warfare certainly was a contributing factor to the disappearance of the Roman, just like it was to the founding peoples of the ancient Greek city-states and even to true blue Magyars (now Lindstedt will really think that I am a Hungarian Jew lawyer), but that factor is certainly there for us modern white folk as well, hence the little "no more brother wars" oft said here by Macrobius and in other places by other white preservationists.
I beg to differ. "The river Orontes has long flowed into the Tiber", wrote Juvenal. Afroasiatic immigrants now were Afroasiatic immigrants then (of which Caracalla would himself be an example); only this time around no German barbarians, untouched by the malaise of civilisation, are coming to tear the whole rotten thing down.
Hordes of "Afroasiatics" were not pouring into western/northwestern Europe during the days of the Empire, not even at its worst days.