Robot Planet Blues

Discussion in 'Dr. Mengele's Laboratory' started by il ragno, Aug 7, 2017.

  1. il ragno Proud American Deplorable

    Member Since:
    May 28, 2010
    Message Count:
    5,177
    Reputation:
    170,696,621
    Ratings Received:
    +9,024 / 30 / -85
    Robot 1: BzzztPOP!....what-do-you-wish-to-do-tonight-Marty3471?

    Robot 2: whirr whirr whirrr k-shuk!....I-do-not-know-Ange505....what-do-you-wish-to-do-tonight?


    Robots of the World, Unite!
    by Jim Goad

    August 07, 2017

    Antonio Garcia Martinez says he has seen the future, and it made him flee for the woods. Whereas he had previously toiled as a strategist for Goldman Sachs, an advisor for Twitter, and a product manager for Facebook, now he hides among the tall timber somewhere north of Seattle with a gun and a bucket toilet. Martinez claims that his stints in the tech industry led him to believe that the robots are coming, and they will spare few in their path:

    While this may sound like the delusional frothing of a Luddite crank, many others in high places share Martinez’s fears. Artificial-intelligence guru Jeremy Howard says that if anything, people need to be more worried about robots displacing, dislocating, and forever setting adrift large segments of the work force. He dismisses the eternal optimists’ stubborn notion that while technology may temporarily replace old jobs, it always creates a sufficient number of new ones:

    Howard predicts that a “tiny class of society” will seize control of all wealth and will grow to despise the vast swaths of an obsolete working class who’ve been replaced by technology and will thus be essentially “worthless” leeches in the new all-tech economy.

    The unfortunate and seemingly inexorable fact is that technological advances will make most workers too physically weak and mentally sluggish to compete with robots. Whereas the old socialist worldview was that a tiny and lazy elite sponged off the proletariat’s invaluable labor, this new world will be characterized by billions of unskilled layabouts hoping for pity and begging for handouts from a tiny, productive elite. Ironically, technology may pave the way for a reverse scenario where the only people being exploited are an ultra-wealthy and super-intelligent elite—AKA, those who are already being accused of unfairly possessing “cognitive privilege.”

    Despite Donald Trump’s campaign focus on jobs lost due to outsourcing, a recent study at Ball State University found that of the 5.6 million manufacturing jobs lost in America between 2000 and 2010, 85% were due to automation.

    A 2013 study by a pair of Oxford economists predicted that automation may gobble up a full 45% of all US jobs over the next two decades. Entire professions once thought of as the exclusive domain of the working class—such as commercial driving, retail work, and restaurant gigs—may soon be transferred wholesale to machines. Even much of white-collar “mental work” such as legal research, translation, data analysis, and journalism may soon be stripped raw from humans and given to their unfeeling artificial-intelligence successors. Earlier this year, the White House issued a report claiming that 83% of jobs paying less than $20 per hour will soon succumb to automation.

    The national US unemployment rate for July was 4.3%, a somewhat underwhelming number when you ponder that nearly 100 million Americans of working age are no longer even considered part of the work force. That means 37.2% of the eligible workforce “is not working or even looking.”

    Still, the paid quislings at the Washington Post attempt to assure us that even though “the robots will steal our jobs,” that’s “fine,” because there will always be newer and cleaner jobs where those came from.

    The idea of “technological unemployment” goes back at least to Aristotle, who suggested that human labor would be unnecessary with sufficient technological advances. John Stuart Mill even suggested prohibiting technology lest in its relentless advancement, it stomped all workers to death. And the Luddites famously destroyed machines they feared would take their jobs. But since widespread prosperity and employment kept pace with technology for a time, any concerns that automation would render most workers useless were dismissed as a “Luddite fallacy.” But in 2014, former skeptic Larry Summers of Harvard University said he finally believed that technology would displace huge segments of the work force and that this was nothing to celebrate: “This isn’t some hypothetical future possibility. This is something that’s emerging before us right now.”

    Amplifying fears of mass unemployment and the consequent widespread purposeless anomie is something that until very recently was only considered the domain of dystopian sci-fi novels: The idea that robots will one day acquire sufficient intelligence to dominate or even eradicate humanity. This is not a fear exclusive to schizophrenics and speed freaks: Tech titan Elon Musk, who’s worth an estimated $21 billion, says he’s “terrified” of AI and warned a gathering of US state governors that it “poses a fundamental risk to the existence of human civilization.”

    As a partial remedy for the looming “Robocalypse,” Musk recommends a universal basic income. While this might allow the economy to keep chugging along, at least for a little while, it won’t address the deep scars that feeling worthless inflicts on the human psyche. For whatever stupid reason, people need to feel needed. For many humans, feeling dependent is even more demoralizing than feeling exploited.

    Combined with the atomizing effects of coerced diversity, society faces the unsavory specter of generations of once-vital people set free to do nothing and be nothing, smacked in the face with the double-handed bitch slaps of economics and demographics.

    The most terrifying future dystopia may not involve a surfeit of workers and a scarcity of goods. Technology might save the day in the sense that everyone has three meals to eat, a warm place to sleep, and lives to be three hundred years old.

    The problem may lie in billions of humans who serve no useful purpose.

    The great bulk of humanity may be left idle and abjectly dependent—self-hating parasites who can only take because they have nothing to give. For all they’ll wind up losing in what it means to be human, they might as well be robots, anyway.
    Latest Given Reputation Points:
    Blitzed: 35,532 Points Aug 7, 2017
    Bluto: 224,538 Points Aug 7, 2017
    Prima Morte: 45,648 Points Aug 7, 2017
    • Informative Informative x 3
    • List
  2. rasputin Forum Veteran

    Member Since:
    Apr 22, 2010
    Message Count:
    3,993
    Reputation:
    94,785,355
    Ratings Received:
    +6,061 / 11 / -10
    It's the perfect storm -- the rise of chimp-like IQ masses and the robots at the same time.While the white people have an excuse like trying to get to Mars, creating art masterpieces etc, there is absolutely no reason to exist for the subhumans. That includes chinks too, since when left alone, they are too busy trying to figure out how to grow their penis.

    If niggers and muds were (properly) classified as animals, the shitlibs all over the planet would have been screaming about their effect on the environment.
    Latest Given Reputation Points:
    Blitzed: 35,532 Points Aug 7, 2017
    Bluto: 224,538 Points Aug 7, 2017
    Georg Schoenerer: 28,806 Points (they gots to go) Aug 7, 2017
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • List
  3. il ragno Proud American Deplorable

    Member Since:
    May 28, 2010
    Message Count:
    5,177
    Reputation:
    170,696,621
    Ratings Received:
    +9,024 / 30 / -85
    An achievement which continues to elude them.
    Latest Given Reputation Points:
    Bluto: 224,538 Points Aug 7, 2017
  4. Bluto Drunken lout

    Member Since:
    Apr 22, 2010
    Message Count:
    13,270
    Reputation:
    257,940,623
    Ratings Received:
    +17,657 / 68 / -168
    Latest Given Reputation Points:
    Mandalore: 84,690 Points (Beat me to it. Cocksucker.) Aug 7, 2017
  5. Neil Pye Forum Veteran

    Member Since:
    Feb 28, 2015
    Message Count:
    694
    Reputation:
    33,347,245
    Ratings Received:
    +1,475 / 1 / -2
    When you create "thinking machines" and program them to think and act with logic while at the same time you program them to recognize niggers and muds as "humans" and men as women and vise versa, the end result becomes something like this:
  6. Mandalore in recovery from sobriety

    Member Since:
    Apr 20, 2010
    Message Count:
    3,160
    Reputation:
    91,640,031
    Ratings Received:
    +5,456 / 38 / -88
    I'm a lot more worried about Jews than I am about robots.
    Latest Given Reputation Points:
    Bluto: 224,651 Points (Indubitably. Runt.) Aug 8, 2017
    • Post of the Day Post of the Day x 2
    • List
  7. WFHermans Forum Veteran

    Member Since:
    May 12, 2010
    Message Count:
    652
    Reputation:
    30,700,233
    Ratings Received:
    +1,026 / 9 / -0
    Robots have a right to their homeland! What are you, an anti-robotite? Robots also have the right to defend their homeland. Never forget the 6 million robots that were melted and turned into Iron Crosses!
  8. LastChanceArmada Forum Veteran

    Member Since:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Message Count:
    459
    Reputation:
    30,901,240
    Ratings Received:
    +800 / 0 / -1
    Indeed. We're importing tens of millions of bipeds that were arguably obsoleted with 19th century technology, much less 21st century technology, at a time when we can neither afford them or use them. Of course, (((You Know Who))) is going to use this excuse of "the new dispossessed... 'urban underclass'" (i.e., the parasitical mud population) as an excuse to further suck the host parasite dry (you can already see this with the recent Zuckershitz push for "universal basic income" and the like.)

    I don't know if the predictions of nascent robot takeover are quite as dire as this article portends, but automation is definitely real and it's probably going to be the case that anyone who is not some sort of skilled technician with at least a 115 IQ will be in a world of hurt in pretty short order here (if not already).
  9. Bluto Drunken lout

    Member Since:
    Apr 22, 2010
    Message Count:
    13,270
    Reputation:
    257,940,623
    Ratings Received:
    +17,657 / 68 / -168
    shit- Bluto keeps readin' da t'read headline as "Robert Plant Blues"-
  10. Georg Schoenerer Der Judenkenner

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2015
    Message Count:
    1,005
    Location:
    Oy Vey Up North
    Reputation:
    46,127,599
    Ratings Received:
    +1,831 / 3 / -43
  11. fuz al-nufi Bar Regular

    Member Since:
    Apr 20, 2010
    Message Count:
    5,591
    Location:
    wonderland
    Reputation:
    110,780,971
    Ratings Received:
    +6,248 / 331 / -379
    i rlly dont get the huge backlash to universal basic income. All it'd take is raise taxes on the ultra-rich a couple percentage points and u could easily cut everyone in the '99%' a monthly cheque. But u no god forbid u raise taxes on billionaires and multinational corporations with GDPs bigger than some countries. I get the whole identity being inextricably linked to a persons job and also this need to feel 'independent'(just a laughable illusion)but in the futur when most ppl dont have jobs its not going to be like that.

    ppl are going to have alot more freetime on their hands and if there isnt a social safety net to keep them fed with a roof over their heads things will inevitably descend into a children of men post-apocalypse type scenario. If u look at it from the perspective of the government or the elite the options in the future will be universal basic income or total genocide via biological warfare and replace most peons with robots. Otherwise ur going to have roving bands of starving cannibal-zombies.

Share This Page