Playboy Will No Longer Publish Nude Photos

Discussion in 'The Man Cave' started by Johnson, Oct 13, 2015.

  1. Johnson neanderthals among us

    Member Since:
    Apr 20, 2010
    Message Count:
    10,233
    Location:
    shit abyss
    Reputation:
    171,831,161
    Ratings Received:
    +13,794 / 193 / -306
    http://www.nbcnews.com/pop-culture/...-no-longer-publish-nude-photos-report-n443321

    Now readers of Playboy, the glossy men's magazine known for its nude fold-outs, can honestly say they are buying the magazine for its articles.

    Playboy will no longer publish nude photographs of women, the New York Times reported on Monday in an article quoting Scott Flanders, the company's chief executive.

    At a time when every teenage boy has an Internet connected phone and the web is rife with pornography, the magazine has opted to continue featuring women in provocative poses, just not completely nude, the Times said.

    "You're now one click away from every sex act imaginable for free," Flanders was quoted as saying in the Times. "And so it's just passe at this juncture."
    Latest Given Reputation Points:
    Bluto: 67,841 Points (shit-) Oct 13, 2015
    Burt: 6,924 Points Oct 13, 2015
    Angroid: 37,518 Points (shit-) Oct 14, 2015
    • Informative Informative x 2
    • List
  2. Ozzy Bon Halen LOLworthy Threadmonkey & Critic Of Texas Dentistry

    Member Since:
    Sep 29, 2011
    Message Count:
    7,657
    Location:
    In a van down by the river
    Reputation:
    92,805,589
    Ratings Received:
    +8,506 / 16 / -23
    LOL @ VICE readers not having jobs. They want to compete with VICE? Well, better start raking in that investor ca$h and start making cheesy youtube documentaries then.


    All VICE is good for is making bad documentaries and raking in investor ca$h. Can you say runaway valuation?


    http://www.theguardian.com/media/2014/sep/04/vice-investment-investment-digital-media

    http://www.forbes.com/sites/jeffber...s-worth-1-4-billion-could-it-be-in-play-soon/


    The fact is that dumb ass investors are just throwing bucketloads of ca$h at "alternative media". Another bubble in the making. This kind of thing never ends well.

    http://www.theawl.com/2015/09/dox-dox-dox-ii-the-doxxing
    Latest Given Reputation Points:
    Johnson: 67,285 Points Oct 13, 2015
    Burt: 6,924 Points Oct 13, 2015
    Angroid: 37,518 Points (VICE = Kikery) Oct 14, 2015
    • Informative Informative x 3
    • List
  3. Bluto Drunken lout

    Member Since:
    Apr 22, 2010
    Message Count:
    11,944
    Reputation:
    173,986,033
    Ratings Received:
    +15,375 / 63 / -165
    Da world is truly mad.
    Latest Given Reputation Points:
    Burt: 6,924 Points Oct 13, 2015
    Angroid: 37,518 Points Oct 14, 2015
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • List
  4. Ozzy Bon Halen LOLworthy Threadmonkey & Critic Of Texas Dentistry

    Member Since:
    Sep 29, 2011
    Message Count:
    7,657
    Location:
    In a van down by the river
    Reputation:
    92,805,589
    Ratings Received:
    +8,506 / 16 / -23
    Also applicable is the fact that a lot of "alternative media" is funded by special interest groups, investors and even governments to push a specific narrative. It almost makes Alex Jewns and Infowhores seem credible considering that his only goal is to acquire ZOG shekels. And sell crappy DVDS and prepper survival gear.

    http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/kre...sts-spending-millions-less-america-propaganda


    And how the fuck exactly, do pray tell, did a "punk rock" indie magazine called The Voice of Montreal supposedly influenced and modeled off Jim Goad's Answer Me! magazine morph into a multi-billion $$$ juggernaut called VICE media? It's almost as puzzling as how a fat, ugly, untalented and annoying lil' jewess named Amy Schumer can come out of nowhere and become famous overnight.

    Latest Given Reputation Points:
    Burt: 6,924 Points Oct 13, 2015
  5. Roy Fokker Forum Veteran

    Member Since:
    Jul 29, 2012
    Message Count:
    7,430
    Reputation:
    92,052,285
    Ratings Received:
    +9,227 / 164 / -253
  6. Angroid CyberSperg 1138

    Member Since:
    Sep 4, 2012
    Message Count:
    5,341
    Location:
    EUSSR
    Reputation:
    70,084,745
    Ratings Received:
    +7,533 / 27 / -45
    No tits? Expect Playboy to do an about-face in 2 months... alternatively perhaps they'll start running glossy spreads o' ripped-n-oiled-up homos to appeal to deir new yout hipster demographic.
  7. VetForumWars Forum Veteran

    Member Since:
    Oct 28, 2013
    Message Count:
    1,879
    Reputation:
    20,067,957
    Ratings Received:
    +2,748 / 9 / -9
    Not even a tasteful and artsy topless photo? Wow, that's depressing.
    Latest Given Reputation Points:
    Angroid: 37,542 Points (wut r dey be tinking... need to fire deir head o' corporate strategy) Oct 15, 2015

Share This Page