PJB: After Trump Comes....What?

Discussion in 'This Cesspool We Live In' started by il ragno, Aug 10, 2017.

  1. il ragno Proud American Deplorable

    Member Since:
    May 28, 2010
    Message Count:
    5,092
    Reputation:
    160,061,682
    Ratings Received:
    +8,823 / 29 / -85
    After The Anti-Trump Coup, What Then?

    Patrick J. Buchanan
    August 7, 2017, 4:23 pm


    That the Trump presidency is bedeviled is undeniable.

    As President Donald Trump flew off for August at his Jersey club, there came word that Special Counsel Robert Mueller III had impaneled a grand jury and subpoenas were going out to Trump family and campaign associates.

    The jurors will be drawn from a pool of citizens in a city Hillary Clinton swept with 91 percent of the vote. Trump got 4 percent.

    Whatever indictments Mueller wants, Mueller gets.


    Thanks to a media that savages him ceaselessly, Trump is down to 33 percent approval in a Quinnipiac University poll and below 40 percent in most of the rest.

    Before Trump departed D.C., The Washington Post ran transcripts of his phone conversations with the leaders of Mexico and Australia.

    Even Obama administration veterans were stunned.


    So, it is time to ask: If this city brings Trump down, will the rest of America rejoice?

    What will be the reaction out there in fly-over country, that land where the “deplorables” dwell who produce the soldiers to fight our wars? Will they toast the “free press” that brought down the president they elected, and in whom they had placed so much hope?

    My guess: The reaction will be one of bitterness, cynicism, despair, a sense that the fix is in, that no matter what we do, they will not let us win. If Trump is brought down, American democracy will take a pasting. It will be seen as a fraud. And the backlash will poison our politics to where only an attack from abroad, like 9/11, will reunite us.

    Our media preen and posture as the defenders of democracy, devoted to truth, who provide us round-the-clock protection from tyranny. But half the nation already sees the media as a propaganda arm of a liberal establishment that the people have rejected time and again.

    Consider the Post‘s publication of the transcripts of Trump’s calls with Mexico’s president and Australia’s prime minister.

    When reporter Greg Miller got these transcripts, his editors, knowing they would damage Trump, plastered them on Page 1.

    The Post was letting itself be used by a leaker engaged in disloyal and possibly criminal misconduct. Yet the Post agreed to provide confidentiality and to hide the Trump-hater’s identity.

    This is what we do, says the Post.
    People have a right to know if President Trump says one thing at rallies about Mexico paying for the wall and another to the president of Mexico. This is a story.

    But there is a far larger story here, of which this Post piece is but an exhibit. It is the story of a concerted campaign, in which the anti-Trump media publish leaks, even criminal leaks, out of the FBI, CIA, NSA and NSC, to bring down a president whom the Beltway media and their deep-state collaborators both despise and wish to destroy.

    Did Trump collude with Putin to defeat Clinton, the Beltway media demand to know, even as they daily collude with deep-state criminals to bring down the president of the United States.


    And if there is an unfolding silent coup by the regime Americans repudiated in 2016–to use security leaks and the lethal weapon of a special counsel to overturn the election results–is that not a story worth covering as much as what Trump said to Pena Nieto?

    Do the people not have a right know who are the snakes collaborating with the Never-Trump press to bring down their head of state? Is not discovering the identities of deep-state felons a story that investigative reporters should be all over?

    If Greg Miller is obligated to protect his source, fine. But why are other journalists not exposing his identity?

    The answer suggests itself. This is a collaborative enterprise, where everyone protects everyone else’s sources, because all have the same goal: the dumping of Trump. If that requires collusion with criminals, so be it.

    The Justice Department is now running down the leaks, and the ACLU‘s Ben Wizner is apoplectic: “Every American should be concerned about the Trump administration’s threat to step up its efforts against whistleblowers and journalists. A crackdown on leaks is a crackdown on the free press and on democracy.”

    That’s one way to put it. Another is that some of these “whistleblowers” are political criminals who reject the verdict of the American electorate in 2016 and are out to overturn it. And the aforementioned “journalists” are their enablers and collaborators.

    And if, as Wizner’s asserts, protecting secrets is tantamount to a “crackdown on the free press and democracy,” no wonder the free press and democracy are falling into disrepute all over the world.

    By colluding, the mainstream media, deep state, and the special prosecutor’s button men, with a license to roam, may bring down yet another president. So doing, they will validate John Adams’s insight:

    “Democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.”
    Latest Given Reputation Points:
    4PortHub: 15,019 Points (I have for months been peeved at the sore losers who consider my vote for Trump as "mistaken". Condescending would-be authorities who are cheaters.) Aug 10, 2017
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
    • List
  2. EthanEdwards Coming back to Life

    Member Since:
    Dec 29, 2013
    Message Count:
    432
    Reputation:
    4,079,183
    Ratings Received:
    +423 / 2 / -3
    .... Personally, I think a 2nd Term for Trump is inevitable, only if he gets rid of his OWN swamp ... I think McConnell is a washed up [place adjective here], Ryan is not far behind, in fact he may be waiting to the last drop...only to say he was there, and still failed! Trump can and will, if need be, convince people, without too much trouble, that these two, in particular are the problem of getting his agenda done.....because they have their OWN agenda's...it like what the *uck? These white nigga's promised 7 years of repeal and replace...and failed miserably...*uck'em..both!
  3. il ragno Proud American Deplorable

    Member Since:
    May 28, 2010
    Message Count:
    5,092
    Reputation:
    160,061,682
    Ratings Received:
    +8,823 / 29 / -85
    In order to address his supporters, he needs to address the nation to say so. I mean either from the Oval Office, or standing at a podium, but the main thing is....not on Twitter. Twitter was perfect back when he the candidate in Exile, because it underscored the MSM's closed shop stewardship of all public discourse and information in this country, to devastating effect. (It won't be long before every candidate for office, including all the toxic ones, campaign via Twitter - particularly if they succeed in toppling Pres Trump, when public loathing of politicians climbs so sky-high only the fake populists stand a prayer of being elected).

    But he's the President of the United States, and it's time he started rubbing the SJW clique's faces in that fact. (No matter what they try to make you think, the Shitlibs are and will always remain a minority in this country; the reason it seems otherwise is that they currently control the three megaphones: broadcast, print and digital.) Psychologically, we the people who voted him in need, I think, to see him addressing us from the Oval Office, surrounded by the symbols of American executive power; and I for one want to see him reference his non-Obama predecessors in the office, regardless of whether it's just Millard Fillmore. He's got to lay off the Twitter for awhile and start appearing, y'know....Presidential.
    Latest Given Reputation Points:
    billy_boatrocker: 52,951 Points (Excellent points.) Aug 11, 2017
    • Informative Informative x 1
    • List

Share This Page