Black Diversity Chief forced into grovelling apology and forced out at crApple....

Discussion in 'This Cesspool We Live In' started by Angroid, Nov 19, 2017.

  1. Angroid CyberSperg 1138

    Member Since:
    Sep 4, 2012
    Message Count:
    5,903
    Location:
    EUSSR
    Reputation:
    110,055,296
    Ratings Received:
    +8,416 / 28 / -46
    fo' sayin' dat "12 blue-eyed Whiteboys can still be diverse" an dat it gets old to exclusively tag faggots, degenerates, feminazis and wookies wit da "divershitty" label.

    Shit.... u couldn't make diss up. The lady no doubt had to make an apology to get her pay-ola-off from (((Apple))).

  2. Angroid CyberSperg 1138

    Member Since:
    Sep 4, 2012
    Message Count:
    5,903
    Location:
    EUSSR
    Reputation:
    110,055,296
    Ratings Received:
    +8,416 / 28 / -46
    lolwut, (((Heebes))) ain't White.
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Like Like x 1
    • Post of the Day Post of the Day x 1
    • List
  3. billy_boatrocker Virtue Signaler

    Member Since:
    Apr 26, 2010
    Message Count:
    3,179
    Location:
    Portland, Oregon
    Reputation:
    60,300,231
    Ratings Received:
    +3,855 / 10 / -14
    800 billion dollar market cap. Supposedly the biggest company in the world.... and they want to commit suicide it seems. This diversity fallacy is toxic.
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
    • List
  4. il ragno Proud American Deplorable

    Member Since:
    May 28, 2010
    Message Count:
    5,175
    Reputation:
    170,586,077
    Ratings Received:
    +9,020 / 30 / -85
    Sadly, you are incorrect - that 800 billion dollar market cap allows them the cushion to play-act at Diversity in a way that might well sink a smaller, saner firm.

    Anyway - hssst - here's a secret: tech giants like Apple are only playing a waiting game, until robots and drones can make all the important decisions safeguarding their assets. After which they can hire all the hunchbacked lesbian Malaysian trannies they care to, since the human part of middle and upper management will be strictly cosmetic.
  5. Whitestmanalive Bar Regular

    Member Since:
    Sep 28, 2017
    Message Count:
    92
    Reputation:
    1,581,588
    Ratings Received:
    +79 / 3 / -0
    A Vice President of diversity? How does such a job even exist?

    Honestly I never realized that all these diversity jobs and diversity departments existed until I joined TBB.
  6. LastChanceArmada Forum Veteran

    Member Since:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Message Count:
    459
    Reputation:
    30,745,229
    Ratings Received:
    +796 / 0 / -1
    Oh yeah, I'm sure pretty much every Fortune 500 company has a Chief Diversity Officer now -- you know, because diversity is just such an obvious good that it needs to be enforced at the absolute top of the hierarchy in order to make it work.

    Ironically this woman did nothing but state the obvious. She could have gone one step further and just said that really, all "diversity" does is lower things to the lowest common denominator, e.g., all you can talk to the dotheads about is food since they aren't going to get any more abstract or "white" sort of ideas or concepts.

    In my experience, "corporate diversity" in IT means two things:

    [1] Replacing white (and more specifically white male) engineers with dots. They won't necessarily explicitly fire white men, but what they will do is create an (whether this is intentional or not I'll leave up to you) insufferable working environment that causes most white people to leave, then they won't replace them. My company was about 90% dot before I left -- not necessarily in ALL departments, but in quite a few of them (what happens is... once the dots get a foothold somewhere, they then only hire and promote other dots.) And trust me, I was about THE last holdout. Most people bailed on it years ago. (Had my pay not easily been in the top quartile of what I do, I might have bailed sooner as well. It was a deal with the devil and I'm paying a price for it, now.)

    [2] Promoting Negroes and other "diverse" demographics into management positions (versus technical positions) since the damage they can do is less quantifiable there. Of course, management positions are supposed to be a reward for technical acumen mixed with people skills. The end result is probably going to be far more catastrophic than if they'd just pushed "diversity" in the engineering rank-and-file first, but it's not nearly as readily apparent if you're just attending meetings and making Powerpoint slides (pretty much all I did before I left.) Writing buggy code, OTOH, is very quantifiable and very prone to metrics on employees.

    I should also add another trend I saw: putting Negroes in ultra-low-level "button pusher / could be automated easily" or "e-mail forwarder" type jobs (after hours maintenance tech support, etc) with bullshit "engineer" type titles, even though the "job" might consist of little more than coordinating routine production maintenance work or what have you -- something a reasonably bright, reasonably hard working newly minted liberal arts graduate could competently do.

    All that being said, they won't get rid of all white males because they quite simply can't, but what ends up happening is white men are the absolute last in line for promotions and the like. Of course there's always a few "superstar" type employees at the very top of the hierarchy and given that White Muricans are usually very individualistic, don't question the system yet because it's still working for them. God, when I think about those white goy managers that decided to offshore and outsource the whole department though, it makes my blood boil!

    I don't see this new affirmative action shakedown of technology ending well for most tech companies. Where I worked, it was an unmitigated disaster, but the B-school types don't ever learn the obvious lessons since replacing American workers with dots always evinces a short-term financial payoff (even as a few years later all of the same "geniuses" scratch their heads and wonder why they've got so many more outages.) Liberals, feminists, Jews, and all of the other usual suspects pushing for this thing have the "narrative" that it's only because of some good 'ol boy network that causes white men be "overrepresented" in technology. Like this typical headline here from CNN: the "narrative" has it that instantly it's unequivocally bad that white men are 56% of its workforce: like none of those white men did ANYTHING to do anything in technology.

    http://money.cnn.com/2017/06/29/technology/google-diversity-report/index.html

    Point being, I'd really love to see companies just try to staff a large competent software development organization with all blacks and mestizos or what have you. It sucks to say it, but if I were really a tech giant I'd think about relocating at least in part to Singapore or similar, where you could be assured of a competent workforce. I really see a push in the next few years for Al Sharpton and his ilk to demand that Silicon Valley be 15% black or something like that.
    Latest Given Reputation Points:
    rasputin: 91,899 Points Dec 3, 2017
    Angroid: 107,671 Points Dec 4, 2017
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
    • List
  7. rasputin Forum Veteran

    Member Since:
    Apr 22, 2010
    Message Count:
    3,988
    Reputation:
    94,364,014
    Ratings Received:
    +6,049 / 11 / -10
    Writing bad code is not immediately quantifiable -- at least not to the management types. Reality will eventually catch up, but it may take a few years, in the span of which a team may turn completely dot.

    In corporate speak, what the shitlibs are doing is creating a "hostile work environment" for the whites, but since it's the whites, it's OK.

    Technologically what's going on is lowering the standards and reverting to extensive rather than intensive methods of writing software. In other words, dumbing down and idiocracy. Is anyone surprised that instead of going to Mars we are occupied by the most important and puzzling subject of why niggers can't learn math?

    Once the writing is on the wall, whites should leave the hostile teams and move on and let them fail. Or just stop doing anything and wait for a severance check, while exploring opportunities elsewhere.
    Latest Given Reputation Points:
    LastChanceArmada: 28,459 Points (Don't I know it!) Dec 3, 2017
    Angroid: 107,671 Points Dec 4, 2017
  8. Angroid CyberSperg 1138

    Member Since:
    Sep 4, 2012
    Message Count:
    5,903
    Location:
    EUSSR
    Reputation:
    110,055,296
    Ratings Received:
    +8,416 / 28 / -46
    Shit, so many parallels to my own shituation over da years. It's crawling where I is too. What's interesting though is that a lotsa da traditional IT jobs r disapearing fast. Infrastructure be's in code now yo, and a lots of muppets are just becoming surplus to requirements. A small team of specialists can handle what used to require an army of morans to manage & maintain.

    Band together with some like-minded clued up guys, form a consultancy / mini-company / syndicate and go coontracting for the Corporates. That way there's no HR bullshit & quotas to deal with, no fucking wanker self-assessment shiite etc. Just pure devil dollar zogbux for ur tax free Hong Kong account.

    HEiL HiTLER o/
  9. LastChanceArmada Forum Veteran

    Member Since:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Message Count:
    459
    Reputation:
    30,745,229
    Ratings Received:
    +796 / 0 / -1
    It's hard to say. Stuff like Amazon Web Services technically outsources putting applications in the cloud and what have you, but it seems like all this does is make companies want to do bigger and bigger things. The whole world of distributed computing simply makes my head spin: the last thing we were architecting was a real-time NoSQL streaming application designed to handle 50k transactions per second with about five dozen downstream applications consuming the capacity through microservices. We had about fifty servers in our production environment, just absolutely massive. To put things in context, the first "real" server I worked on 20 years ago at my first real IT job was the size of a small refrigerator and had one gigabyte of RAM, which seemed like science fiction to me at the time. Now I've got a new Linux desktop that's as powerful as one of the servers I was doing development work on at my last programming job about 7 years ago.

    So yeah, you'd think that it would just eliminate all jobs, but it seems like the only net result is that people just try to do more. I'm constantly amazed that no matter how much faster hardware gets, we still can't ever seem to do exactly what we need to do with it! Kind of like how you'd think increasing productivity would to a 30 hour work week, when in fact everyone is just working more than ever.

    Oh, and did I mention I'm really sick and tired of the tech industry right now? Between all of the offshoring, massively excessive hours, the main holiday celebrated at the office being Diwali Festival, endless toilet flushing noises on conference calls with the dots (don't laugh, this wasn't a one or two time thing, it happened more times than I can even count), the dumb shithead managers who think nothing of gutting out the entire American middle class for short-term economic gain, and overly entitled, whiny 300 lb. self-proclaimed "geeks" who whine and bitch about working with anything that's not what's perceived as the latest "cool" technology, I've had serious notions of just driving an Uber for a little while to get some cash coming in. On the upside, I've actually dusted off some books and am doing some computer stuff for fun for the first time in MANY years (doing some Python and Scala right now, and man my coding skills are rusty.) Anyway, tech was a decent ride while it lasted and I wonder how many people are going to get shaken out when this next downturn happens, which might be next year.

Share This Page