Discussion in 'The Alley' started by Apocales, Apr 11, 2012.
Yes, white powerfuck.
White power=99.9% kill rate.
Always have been,always will be.
All nonwhites have one purpose=
Yes, as clearly shown by my Avatar.
I'm White Power. My uniform is my skin.
Terrormachine, Copyright 18.
Black may be beautiful,
and tan may be grand but
BUT WHITE IS THE COLOR OF THE BIG BOSS MAN
I am not 100% white power, but I hold whites in great esteem, and prefer them to a bag of rotten candy and corn cobs.
This is the thinking of the Greek people, as well.
I still maintain much of the worldview held by the upper-tier of the movement, but I've mainly given up on activism and/or making it a core part of my identity for a long time. Things were totally different when I was a violent teenager and could see the destruction of my community by multiculturalism and liberal social welfare schemes on a daily basis. I'll still fight against white self-hatred and for our preservation, though. I've just found that obsessing over things that one has the inability to change, e.g., the demographic peril faced by whites in their own countries, isn't healthy and can sometimes be maddening. Be aware, do what you can, and if you have a family, improve your family line.
Edit: All that being said, I still sometimes drink, rock out to "Day of the Sword," and daydream of domestic...."gentrification."
Imminently sensible. Good for you.
Most of the rank-and-file of the Movement™ I am sorry to say, would be losers even in the perfect society they envision, so it stands to reason they've got nothing to lose by being opposed to this one.
Even as fucked-up as it is, it's still possible to get by in this society for normal white people, so they have more to lose by ineffective activisms than do people who would be at the bottom no matter what.
When the muds make it impossible for reasonable white people to get by and raise their families in peace, then things may get interesting. We're trending that way, no doubt about it, but we're not quite there yet.
Give some examples of "make it impossible for reasonable white people to get by and raise their families in peace". Judging from places like this we muds only need to stand in your field of vision for you to feel life isn't worth living anymore.
Honestly though, I wouldn't want those two tattoo'd freaks in my neighborhood either. That is just asking for a meth cooking explosion.
What I mean by that is that overall, wogs are net parasites (our resident employed Persian princess excepted, natch) in terms of $$$. I'm not sure how it works in Scandinavia, as I assume everybody is a net tax parasite.
The more $$$ that are extracted to support underclass breeding, the less resources there are for reasonable white people to raise kids of their own. Note I say reasonable, since yes, there are plenty of whites that need to be cleansed from the gene pool as well.
Point is that, in order to to have the same environment in which to raise children that whitey kids apparently need*, both parents are now working. That does not seem to be enough, and correspondingly standards will slip...already have slipped by having the sprogs in daycare when they are weeks old. Also, even SWPL keep their kids away from niggers. I don't think standing in our white power field of vision does it, but it gets expensive to keep kids out of nigger infested schools without being called a race-iss. Once that's not allowed by law or you can't afford to run away, then what?
Anyway, they will have fewer and fewer kids until there are not enough to pay the bills for everyone else and then what will happen?
*yes, yes there are a bunch of SWPL out there putting their kids in Baby Gap shit and giving them iPods, but we're talking averages here.
Exactly. Everyone acknowledges the cause for the destruction of many of America's formerly proud major cities as the erosion of the tax base, but the liberals will come up with crafty sophist arguments as to "why" this occurred and somehow shift the blame back to whitey. "Well, the automobile came, and they built these nicer homes in suburbia, and then the devils red-lined all of those poor, defenseless black neighborhoods...." Not really - many of these places that ultimately fell to white flight and tax base erosion were still great places to live up until the 1970's or, in some cases, the mid-90's. The leftist argument also presumes that whitey left his old abodes willingly, under no duress, and actually preferred the boring suburban cookie-cutter dysfunctional hell-holes that now dominate the average middle-class white family's life. In reality, the parasites gobbled up as much real estate as they could, and after a generation of ruining one neighborhood, moved to the next "nice" white neighborhood, ruined that, and continued forward. White families then had to trade more debt for bubble equity to escape the chaos. Because the city wogs are net tax parasites, they sewed their own destruction. Now the cities are almost irreparable although the land-use planning nuts (largely liberal types) acknowledge the advantages of urban living, particularly with the problems associated with dependence on gas-guzzling motor vehicles and poor public transport. The problem is we cannot make those places liveable again because such would require *gasp* gentrification or *gasp* whitey actually dislocating someone!
As this darkie-chases-white real-estate process ultimately follows whitey into their suburban and rural enclaves after they've been inculcated with enough white guilt and becomes a more national macro-level problem, circa 2025-2045, the nation will be ruined beyond repair. I speak of America here, although the trend has similarities in some other white countries albeit they may have a different suburban v. urban demographic contradistinction. If you want to make some pig capitalist money during this epoch, try to predict where the white birds will relocate for their final resting places. The WASPjew oligarchs might already be thinking along these lines. :D
Who knows what the economic fallout will look like, particularly when you combine the accounting for our current public and private debt levels, our projected debt levels, the problems with sustaining the social welfare paradigm JUST because of the graying population demographic issues, and so forth, but the end result may make 1990's Russia collapse look like a Disney ride. Or it might end somewhat peaceably with productive white (lump in the upper-tier East Asians too, if one wants to be fair) families retaining much of their private capital (I doubt it).
You can invite your young female relatives, but please no male wogs.
Funny thread being turned serious.