A nuclear WWIII will never happen. Dishonor will prevent it.

Discussion in 'The Round Robin' started by Greatest I am, Oct 11, 2017 at 7:02 PM.

  1. Greatest I am Active Member

    Member Since:
    Apr 15, 2013
    Message Count:
    187
    Reputation:
    -20,256,815
    Ratings Received:
    +28 / 72 / -209
    A nuclear WWIII will never happen. Dishonor will prevent it.



    Wars are fought for honor and a nuclear WWII would have nothing but shame for the initiator of such a war.



    Our leaders know that there would be no honor in a nuclear war that would destroy our environment and insure that there is no real winner. Any leader or military war machine under his command that would initiate such a war would know dishonor like the world has never seen. The hate for Hitler and his regime and ideology is still alive and well in the world and that hate would be dwarfed by the hate that the initiator of a third WWIII would feel from the world.



    The main reason for that hate and denial of honor would stem from the fact that any nuclear war would be fought against cities and their citizen instead of having an honorable battlefield war. No leader or military force will dishonor itself the way the U.S. did in Japan. Honor in war comes from facing an enemy man to man and our technology has now made that impossible. There is no honor in killing innocent non-combatant citizens in their beds from thousands of miles away. Ordinary people know this and so do their leaders and military.



    Mutual assured destruction says that any nuclear war will be self-genocide. Some who do not know why wars are fought, and honor sought, may think some leaders are foolish enough to initiate a nuclear war but forget that no high ranking military man, especially of Asian descent, would ever dishonor himself and his family by initiating such a war. Such a man of honor would never initiate such a dishonorable war. A man of honor would know though that he would not be doing his duty if he did not retaliate. Reciprocity is fair play and is honorable and duty and honor would force a reciprocal reply.



    Do you understand the psychological principles at play shown above and do you agree?



    Regards

    DL
    Latest Given Reputation Points:
    Sam Crow: 15,150 Points Oct 11, 2017 at 9:31 PM
    Bluto: -241,568 Points Oct 11, 2017 at 9:32 PM
    Burt: -40,438 Points Oct 15, 2017 at 3:37 PM
    • Gay Post Gay Post x 2
    • Disagree Disagree x 1
    • List
  2. Johnson TRuMP

    Member Since:
    Apr 20, 2010
    Message Count:
    10,756
    Location:
    internal exile
    Reputation:
    224,696,809
    Ratings Received:
    +14,850 / 204 / -318
  3. Greatest I am Active Member

    Member Since:
    Apr 15, 2013
    Message Count:
    187
    Reputation:
    -20,256,815
    Ratings Received:
    +28 / 72 / -209
    Thanks for opining.

    Regards
    DL
    Latest Given Reputation Points:
    Johnson: -223,611 Points Oct 11, 2017 at 7:13 PM
    Bluto: -241,568 Points Oct 11, 2017 at 9:33 PM
    Burt: -40,438 Points Oct 15, 2017 at 3:37 PM
    • Big Chimpin' Big Chimpin' x 1
    • Gay Post Gay Post x 1
    • List
  4. LastChanceArmada Forum Veteran

    Member Since:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Message Count:
    393
    Reputation:
    24,630,110
    Ratings Received:
    +672 / 0 / -1
    You could easily make the case that all American wars of the past century-plus have been fought for ostensibly "noble" and "patriotic" causes but 0% of them were worthwhile endeavors. From my standpoint, they're all just glorified meat grinders that consist of putting in white farm boys into the meat grinder to go defend the interests of the Zionist Occupation Government and were all based on lies. So what's another million or two dead under another bullshit premise at this point?
    Latest Given Reputation Points:
    Bluto: 241,568 Points Oct 11, 2017 at 9:33 PM
    Johnson: 223,611 Points Oct 11, 2017 at 10:35 PM
    Burt: 40,438 Points Oct 15, 2017 at 3:37 PM
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Post of the Day Post of the Day x 1
    • List
  5. Greatest I am Active Member

    Member Since:
    Apr 15, 2013
    Message Count:
    187
    Reputation:
    -20,256,815
    Ratings Received:
    +28 / 72 / -209
    Thanks for showing your bias. Please refrain.

    "So what's another million or two dead under another bullshit premise at this point?"

    The difference is not in the number.

    It is in the fact that honor will not allow a honorable soldier to pre-emptively murder innocent non-combatant women and children.

    Regards
    DL
    Latest Given Reputation Points:
    Bluto: -242,727 Points Oct 16, 2017 at 1:45 AM
    • Big Chimpin' Big Chimpin' x 1
    • List
  6. fuz al-nufi Bar Regular

    Member Since:
    Apr 20, 2010
    Message Count:
    5,450
    Location:
    wonderland
    Reputation:
    104,819,102
    Ratings Received:
    +6,055 / 313 / -362


    actually no they dont at all. theres a huge double standard and mass-hypocrisy over wat is and wat isnt considered chivalrous in war today. in the west we kill many many thousands of women and children and old people and regular people with our bombs from our jets from 20k feet up and its somehow honourable. few can rlly admit its murderous terrorism against a civilian population.

    but when the one in a million mohammedans with enuf conviction and balls to take vengeance comes to europe and runs over a few people or shoots up a concert of hipsters. its unfathomable y wuld they even do this! in the land of freedom and democracy and love and joy and everything wonderful and sweet under the sun - wat did we ever do to them? other than slaughter their women and children for decades now.

    ur typical westerner is rlly oblivious to the fact their government murders people daily, sometimes hundreds daily, in their names.

    we're entering a new age where civilians r fastly becoming legitimate targets. The great satan has openly stated the women and children related to those it considers enemies can be considered legitimate targets or at the very least collateral damage that is irrelevant.

    but never forget we're the gud guys and theyre the bad guys. and its ok for us to kill babies. because we're us and not them.
  7. Mandalore in recovery from sobriety

    Member Since:
    Apr 20, 2010
    Message Count:
    3,128
    Reputation:
    88,814,814
    Ratings Received:
    +5,368 / 37 / -87
    Fitz, ragheads have been killing each other non-stop since before recorded history. Its just what they do. The only time any of them bitch about civilian casualties is when WE do the killing.

    Yes, we kill countless noncombatants in the Middle East. Our cause is far from just. Nevertheless, the world becomes a slightly better place every time we remove one of those filthy, 2-legged cockroaches. The pollution produced by American factories is nothing compared to the thousands of tons of firewood burned into charcoal every day by mud monkeys just to make a little pocket change. That's not even getting into the endless mountains of refuse that they create without any attempt to manage waste. At least we bury our garbage. They literally shit where they eat and then wipe with the bare left hand. I just can't feel any pity for such useless vermin.
    Latest Given Reputation Points:
    Georg Schoenerer: 38,263 Points (overpopulation--ya gotta start somewhere) Oct 16, 2017 at 10:25 AM
  8. fuz al-nufi Bar Regular

    Member Since:
    Apr 20, 2010
    Message Count:
    5,450
    Location:
    wonderland
    Reputation:
    104,819,102
    Ratings Received:
    +6,055 / 313 / -362
    humans have been killing each other since the beginning of time. europeans mastered killing each other and eventually killing others all over the world.

    well it is a bit disproportionate, the killing. for every one of our civilians they kill we've probably killed a thousand.
  9. WFHermans Forum Veteran

    Member Since:
    May 12, 2010
    Message Count:
    601
    Reputation:
    26,020,864
    Ratings Received:
    +925 / 9 / -0
    In World War 2 the jewmedia was reporting gleefully that one million civilians were killed in Berlin at the last bombardment. In April 1945 it was reported by jewspapers that one million German POWs were killed. And all of it was justified, because they attacked Pearl Harbor (and Los Angeles, according to Steven Spielberg's cinemographic masterpiece 1941).
    Latest Given Reputation Points:
    Georg Schoenerer: 38,263 Points (fuhgedit, he's rolling) Oct 16, 2017 at 10:22 AM
    • Informative Informative x 1
    • List
  10. Mandalore in recovery from sobriety

    Member Since:
    Apr 20, 2010
    Message Count:
    3,128
    Reputation:
    88,814,814
    Ratings Received:
    +5,368 / 37 / -87
    They had already invaded significant portions of Europe long, long before any White nation made an aggressive move in the Middle East. The Crusades were merely reclaiming land that Islam had stolen. Anything we do there is completely justified, especially since you've openly admitted that they're trying to conquer our lands.
  11. Greatest I am Active Member

    Member Since:
    Apr 15, 2013
    Message Count:
    187
    Reputation:
    -20,256,815
    Ratings Received:
    +28 / 72 / -209
    fuz al-nufi

    They can justify a few collaterally killed people.

    They cannot justify a first nuclear strike that could lead to an extinction event of their own people along with the rest of us.

    There is enough garbage in our air without adding tons of radio active particles.

    Many Chernobyls pits spewing radiation would not be good.

    Regards
    DL
  12. Greatest I am Active Member

    Member Since:
    Apr 15, 2013
    Message Count:
    187
    Reputation:
    -20,256,815
    Ratings Received:
    +28 / 72 / -209
    WFHermans

    I understand the situation but fail to see the problem.

    Would you not celebrate the death of those who tried to genocide your people?

    I would.

    Regards
    DL
    Latest Given Reputation Points:
    Georg Schoenerer: -38,263 Points (Germans ain't no genociders--ask the hawaiians) Oct 16, 2017 at 10:28 AM
  13. Greatest I am Active Member

    Member Since:
    Apr 15, 2013
    Message Count:
    187
    Reputation:
    -20,256,815
    Ratings Received:
    +28 / 72 / -209
    Mandalore

    Islam's slave holding ideology is the most vile ideology around today.


    Both Christianity and Islam have basically developed into intolerant, homophobic and misogynous religions. Both religions have grown themselves by the sword instead of good deeds and continue with their immoral ways in spite of secular law showing them the moral ways.



    Jesus said we would know his people by their works and deeds. That means Jesus would not recognize Christians and Muslims as his people, and neither do I. Jesus would call Christianity and Islam abominations.



    Gnostic Christians did in the past, and I am proudly continuing that tradition and honest irrefutable evaluation based on morality.



    Regards

    DL
  14. fuz al-nufi Bar Regular

    Member Since:
    Apr 20, 2010
    Message Count:
    5,450
    Location:
    wonderland
    Reputation:
    104,819,102
    Ratings Received:
    +6,055 / 313 / -362
    nuclear weapons can be used tactically. using a nuclear weapon does not necessarily mean it will lead to total war nuclear winter life-on-earth-ending event.
  15. Yakoff Jizzrael Bar Regular

    Member Since:
    May 8, 2010
    Message Count:
    133
    Location:
    outhouse
    Reputation:
    1,516,611
    Ratings Received:
    +46 / 6 / -10

    The reason why Christianity and Islam are the 2 most prominent religions in the world today is because their followers have and had a more proselytizing nature and an expansionist mindset. In other words, they spread by the sword and because they had a quest to convert everybody and spread the heavenly kingdom on earth.

    Religions, like races, don't expand through hippie tolerance and nice deeds, they expand through force.

Share This Page